ABSTRACT
Purpose
Design
Participants
Methods
Main Outcome Measures
Results
Conclusions
Key words
Abbreviations:
AE (adverse event), HFA (Humphrey field analyzer), IOP (intraocular pressure), IRB (Institutional Review Board), IVT (intravitreal), PD (pharmacodynamic(s)), PK (pharmacokinetic(s)), RGC (retinal ganglion cell), SAE (serious adverse event), SD (standard deviation), TEAE (treatment-emergent adverse event)INTRODUCTION
Biggerstaff KS, Lin AP. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG). Accessed November 13, 2020. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1206147-overview#a6
- Phu J
- Agar A
- Wang H
- et al.

METHODS
Study Design
Participants
Randomization and Treatments
Intravitreal Injections
Outcomes
Safety Assessments
Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity Analysis
Statistical Analyses
RESULTS
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
Phase 1a Single-Ascending-Dose Study | Phase 1b Repeat-Ascending-Dose Study | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANX007 1.0 mg (n = 3) | ANX007 2.5 mg (n = 3) | ANX007 5.0 mg (n = 3) | Overall (n = 9) | Sham (n = 6) | ANX007 2.5 mg (n = 6) | ANX007 5.0 mg (n = 5) | Overall (n = 17) | |
Age, mean (SD), yr median (min, max) | 66.3 (12.5) 66.0 (54, 79) | 70.7 (4.0) 73.0 (66, 73) | 72.7 (3.5) 73.0 (69, 76) | 69.9 (7.4) 73.0 (54, 79) | 70.2 (22.8) 79.5 (24, 82) | 60.3 (16.2) 58.5 (35, 78) | 74.0 (8.0) 74.0 (65, 86) | 67.8 (17.2) 75.0 (24, 86) |
Gender, n (%) Male Female | 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) | 3 (100.0) 0 | 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) | 6 (66.7) 3 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) 4 (66.7) | 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) | 8 (47.1) 9 (52.9) |
Race, n (%) Black/African American Asian White | 1 (33.3) 0 2 (66.7) | 0 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3) | 0 0 3 (100.0) | 1 (11.1) 2 (22.2) 6 (66.7) | 0 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) 1 (16.7) 4 (66.7) | 0 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) | 1 (5.9) 3 (17.6) 13 (76.5) |
Height, mean (SD), cm median (min, max) | 174.3 (6.8) 172.0 (169, 182) | 173.3 (7.6) 175.0 (165, 180) | 170.7 (10.0) 170.0 (161, 181) | 172.8 (7.3) 172.0 (161, 182) | 174.3 (10.9) 175.0 (164.0, 184.0 | 167.0 (6.0) 167.5 (165.0, 170.0) | 171.2 (6.6) 170.0 ( 167.0, 172.0) | 170.8 (8.3) 170.0 (165.0, 175.0) |
Weight, mean (SD), kg median (min, max) | 105.2 (6.7) 103.5 (99.5, 112.5) | 83.7 (7.2) 80.0 (79.0, 92.0) | 82.2 (15.6) 86.0 (65.0, 95.5) | 90.3 (14.5) 92.0 (65.0, 112.5) | 74.8 (20.3) 74.35 (57.0, 84.4) | 79.7 (10.1) 80.3 (68.4, 89.0) | 88.4 (15.0) 89.0 (84.0, 94.0) | 80.5 (15.8) 82.0 (68.4, 89.0) |
Single Ascending Doses of ANX007 (Phase 1a)
Phase 1a Single-Ascending-Dose Study | Phase 1b Repeat-Ascending-Dose Study | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | ANX007 1 mg (n = 3) | ANX007 2.5 mg (n = 3) | ANX007 5 mg (n = 3) | Overall (n = 9) | Sham (n = 6) | ANX007 2.5 mg (n = 7) | ANX007 5 mg (n = 5) | Overall (n=18) |
Any TEAE | 3 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) | 6 (33.3) |
Ocular disorders | 3 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 2 (66.7) | 8 (88.9) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (40.0) | 6 (33.3) |
Infection | 0 | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 1 (11.1) | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Injury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Treatment-related TEAE | 3 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 2 (66.7) | 8 (88.9) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (40.0) | 5 (27.8) |
Conjunctival hemorrhage | 0 | 2 (66.7) | 0 | 2 (22.2) | 0 | 0 | 1 (20.0) | 1 (5.5) |
Conjunctival hyperemia | 3 (100.0) | 3 (100.0) | 2 (66.7) | 8 (88.9) | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Eye irritation | 2 (66.7) | 0 | 0 | 2 (22.2) | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 1 (20.0) | 2 (11.1) |
Foreign body sensation in eyes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Ocular hyperemia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Vision blurred | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.5) |
Mean IOP (SD) Median IOP (min, max) | Phase 1a Single Ascending Dose Study | ||
---|---|---|---|
ANX007 1 mg | ANX007 2.5 mg | ANX007 5 mg | |
Baselinea | 17.7 (1.15) 17 (17, 19) | 16.3 (3.06) 17 (13,19) | 15.0 (2.65) 14 (13, 18) |
30 minutes post-injection | 19.3 (2.89) 21 (16, 21) | 17.3 (4.16) 16 (14 ,22) | 18.0 (3.61) 19 (14, 21) |
Day 2 | 16.3 (3.79) 18 (12, 19) | 10.7 (3.06) 10 (8, 14) | 13.3 (2.52) 13 (11, 16) |
Day 4 | 16.0 (2.65) 17 (13, 18) | 13.0 (5.20) 10 (10, 19) | 11.7 (2.31) 13 (9, 13) |
Day 8 | 17.0 (3.61) 16 (14, 21) | 13.0 (1.00) 13 (12, 14) | 13.0 (2.00) 13 (11, 15) |
Day 15 | 18.3 (2.89) 20 (15, 20) | 13.3 (2.52) 13 (11, 16) | 14.0 (1.73) 13 (13, 16) |
Day 29 | 18.3 (1.53) 18 (17, 20) | 17.0 (1.00) 17 (16, 18) | 15.0 (5.29) 13 (11, 21) |
Day 56 | 15.3 (1.15) 16 (14, 16) | 14.0 (1.00) 14 (13, 15) | 14.3 (3.21) 13 (12, 18) |
Randomized Multiple Dosing of ANX007 (Phase 1b)



DISCUSSION
Acknowledgements
Supplementary data
REFERENCES
Biggerstaff KS, Lin AP. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG). Accessed November 13, 2020. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1206147-overview#a6
- Retinal synthesis and deposition of complement components induced by ocular hypertension.Exp Eye Res. 2006; 83: 620-628
- The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma. A review.JAMA. 2014; 311: 1901-1911
- Management of open-angle glaucoma by primary eye-care practitioners towards a personalized medicine approach.Clin Exp Optom. Published online. August 18 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.13114
- Treatment choices for newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients.Eye (Lond). 2020; 34: 60-71
- Systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on open-angle glaucoma.Eye (Lond). 2020; 34: 161-167
- The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease.J Neuroinflammation. 2020; 17: 354
- Complement system in neural elimination in development and disease.Adv Immunol. 2017; 135: 53-79
- The complement system: an unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease.Ann Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 369-389
- Oxidative stress and the regulation of complement activation in human glaucoma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 5071-5082
- Towards a microbead occlusion model of glaucoma for a non-human primate.Sci Rep. 2019; 911572
- Complement component 1Q (C1Q) upregulation in retina of murine, primate, and human glaucomatous eyes.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 1024-1029
- The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination.Cell. 2007; 131: 1164-1178
- Molecular clustering identifies complement and endothelin induction as early events in a mouse model of glaucoma.J Clin Invest. 2011; 121: 1429-1444
- Subretinal macrophages produce classical complement activator C1q leading to the progression of focal retinal degeneration.Mol Neurodegen. 2018; 13: 45
- Nonclinical development of ANX005: A humanized anti-C1q antibody for treatment of autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases.Int J Toxicol. 2017; 36: 449-462
- Deficiency of complement component 5 ameliorates glaucoma in DBA/2J mice.J Neuroinflammation. 2013; 10: 76
- The aqueous humor proteome of primary open-angle glaucoma: an extensive review.Exp Eye Res. 2020; 197108077
- Classical and alternative complement activation on photoreceptor outer segments drives monocyte-dependent retinal atrophy.Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 7348
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Accepted ManuscriptFootnotes
Meeting presentation: These data were presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting 2020.
Financial support: These studies and medical writing support were funded by Annexon Biosciences
Conflict of interest disclosures:
Yang Sun: Received grant support from Annexon Biosciences.
David Wirta: Received grant support from Annexon Biosciences.
Vidhu Mathur, Sethu Sankaranarayanan, Lori K. Taylor, Ted Yednock, Donald S. Fong: Full-time employees of Annexon and may hold Annexon stock and/or stock options.
Wendy Murahashi: Has provided consulting services and holds Annexon stock options.
Jeffrey L. Goldberg: Consultant for Annexon Biosciences.
Precis
Single and repeat intravitreal injections of the anti-C1q antibody fragment ANX007 were well tolerated and demonstrated full target engagement 4 weeks after dosing in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy